What is DMOZ?
You may have heard of a website called DMOZ
and wondered what it was and whether it could help your own
website. This article aims to explain what it is,
why it takes so long to get listed, why
some sites are rejected and a little bit about
the DMOZ editors.
Introduction
DMOZ (also
known as the Open
Directory or ODP)
is the largest, most comprehensive human-edited directory
of the Web with over
4 million websites listed. A web directory is like a huge
reference library. The directory is hierarchically arranged
by subject - from broad to specific. It is built
and maintained by a vast, global community of
volunteer
editors who are responsible for one or more individual categories
(with other editors) of the directory. Every website and
page that is added to the directory has to be manually reviewed
before
it is included. Being listed in the directory is free, you
can not pay to be included in DMOZ.
Getting a website listed in DMOZ can be very frustrating.
As webmasters we know that, because the directory is used
by many sites, getting listed will probably help our search
engine
rankings,
but getting
in
can take
a very
long
time.
In
this article I will explain why it often takes so long
and why what you do when submitting your site is sometimes
the cause of the delay. But first I will explain what
DMOZ is and why it is worthwhile for websites to be listed
in
it.
Very few people actually use DMOZ for searches in the same
way that Google is used, so the directory itself is of
little value in generating traffic. However, its data can
be freely
downloaded, and any website, however small, can use it.
One major website that downloads and uses DMOZ's data
is Google. In fact, Google's directory is nothing less
than
the downloaded DMOZ directory. In fact, our Business
Directory uses a feed from DMOZ
Entries in DMOZ do though have some significant effects
for websites that are listed in DMOZ. PageRank is an integral
part of
Google's
ranking algorithm, and higher PageRank helps towards higher
rankings. The PageRank within a website is increased by pages
from other sites linking to it, and the higher the PageRank
of the pages that link to it, the better it is for the receiving
site.
A listing in DMOZ creates two significant links into a website
- one from DMOZ (Google spiders DMOZ just like it does any
other site) and one from the Google
directory. Both of these
usually
have decent PageRank. Then add the links from the thousands
of smaller sites that have downloaded and use the DMOZ directory,
and you can see why it is usually quite beneficial for a
website to be listed in DMOZ. Simply being listed in DMOZ
can take a website from a Toolbar PageRank value of 3 to
4, and even from 4 to 5 due to the number of incoming links
to the web site.
Why does it take so long to get listed?
At the time of writing, the front page at DMOZ states there
are 68,983 editors who review and add websites to
the directory, but this is fairly misleading. There are not
really that many editors, or anywhere near that many. The
68,983 is the total number of editors that have signed up
since the project started. Many of them are no longer editors.
Of the ones that are still editors, a significant proportion
of them are not actually active or only log in every so often.
This means that the number of editors who are actively
reviewing and adding websites is relatively small.
On the other side of the equation, there is a massive backlog
of sites waiting to be reviewed. Each editor can only edit
in his or her own categories (there are currently 787,774
categories) . Some editors have small categories with very
few submissions to
deal with,
and they
can be dealt
with very quickly. Others are simply overwhelmed by the mountain
of unreviewed sites, and there is little chance of getting
through them in the near future. Of course there are many
categories that no longer have an active editor and any sites
added to these categories face a very long wait.
But the huge backlog, and the relatively low number of active
editors, are not the only reasons why websites seem to wait
forever to get listed. Often the delay is the fault
of the person who submitted the website. Imagine that someone
submits a site to a category that is reasonably close to
what the site is about (for example Regional/Europe/United_Kingdom/Travel_and_Tourism/Accommodation/Hotels)
, but the site really belongs in a different category (Regional/Europe/United_Kingdom/Travel_and_Tourism/Accommodation/Inns/).
What happens? The submission waits
in
the unreviewed queue of the category to which it was submitted.
Sooner or later its turn comes and the editor reviews it,
but finds that it belongs in a different category. That editor
can't edit the other category (remember that editors can
only edit their own categories), so the submission is passed
along to the other category, where
it
is added
to
the unreviewed
queue. It doesn't jump the queue just because it has already
waited in a different queue. Eventually its turn will come
again and it will be reviewed - again. Of course, it's possible
that the first editor has sent the site to a category that
is closer to where it belongs but not necessarily to the
exact one. The editor there eventually
gets to it, and sends it a bit further towards the right
one - maybe to the right one this time, and maybe not - and
the delays mount up just because the person who submitted
the site didn't take enough time to make sure that it was
submitted to the right category in the first place. If the
submitter can't be bothered, why should anyone else be all
that bothered?
So, when submitting a site, always take time to find the
right category for it. Don't be tempted to submit it to a
category that is higher up the tree than it belongs, because
it won't be accepted there and, doing so, could cause unnecessary,
self-inflicted delays.
Why are some sites rejected?
DMOZ's policy is to include sites that have unique content,
which means that many sites don't qualify for inclusion.
Among the sites that are likely to be rejected are those
that have too much content of an affiliate nature. Some affiliate
content is acceptable but when it occupies too much of a
site, then the site will probably be rejected.
Another reason why a site may be rejected is because of
the submission. If the Title and Description provided in
the submission don't follow DMOZ's guidelines for the category,
then some editors will think, "If you can't be bothered
to spend a little time on it, why should I bother rewriting
it for
you?", and reject the site. Personally, I find it hard
to believe that editors would do that, and in fact try to
update the title and description on any sites that I approve
where necessary, but I've heard of it happening. So, when
submitting a site, read
and
follow
the guidelines. The description is intended to give people
an objective statement of what can be found in the site,
and not to promote it.
People are not informed that their site has been rejected,
or even in many cases when it has been accepted, and there
must be many people out there who think their submissions
are still pending when, in fact, they've already been rejected.
About the DMOZ editors
As I mentioned earlier, there are not
many active editors when compared to the number shown on
DMOZ's front page and
the number of categories, but most of those that are active
are keen. They are keen to
add websites that have unique content, and keen to improve
the directory. They also have a fair amount of knowledge
about thier individual categories. Contrary to what some
people think, they do care about the directory
and about adding new sites, but they have an uphill struggle
both because there aren't enough of them and because of the
standard of some of the submissions.
Of course if you want to help
edit DMOZ the best way is
to find a category that interests you and that you have some
experience in, then click on the "Become an Editor" link,
reads the tips and advice, complete the application form
and wait for approval from a senior editor.
|